Understand complex situations.
Develop new possibilities for action.
When threats, technologies and organisations change together, familiar ways of understanding a situation can become inadequate. Different actors may see different problems. An apparent equipment shortfall may also involve how information is shared, how responsibilities are assigned or how forces are employed. The initial interpretation determines which options are considered – often before its assumptions have been examined.
Military Design Thinking develops the ability to investigate these situations and deliberately shape new approaches. It helps professionals question how a problem has been defined, develop alternative interpretations and turn them into concepts that can be challenged, refined and taken forward.
What makes the practice military
Military design takes place in an environment where an adversary can react to our actions and influence how we understand the situation. Political purpose, legal obligations and command responsibilities shape what can be done. Doctrine, routines and institutional interests influence what organisations recognise as a problem and which answers they consider acceptable.
MDT brings these conditions into the design work. Participants examine their own assumptions alongside those of other actors, consider how an opponent might respond, and assess the organisational changes an approach would require. They learn to develop options while making their reasoning, uncertainties and consequences explicit.
This practice supports work in strategy, operations, capability development, innovation and organisational change. It complements established planning and specialist methods by examining the problem understanding on which they depend.
TRACE connects understanding with action
Developed by Aperion, TRACE connects the conceptual foundations of Military Design Thinking with methods and working tools. It provides a common framework for investigating situations, developing approaches and preparing their further use.
Reveal
Examine assumptions, relationships and competing interpretations; develop alternative ways of framing the problem.
Architect
Develop alternative approaches and explain how they could produce the intended change.
Contest
Challenge the framing and proposed approaches against adversary responses, unintended consequences and practical constraints.
Embed
Prepare who will decide, test or take an approach forward, and what they need to do so.
TRACE is iterative. Findings from developing or challenging an approach can require the team to revisit the original task and problem framing.

Military Design Thinking Practitioner
Apply MDT to bounded tasks. Learn to work through TRACE, examine problem framings and develop defensible approaches. Apply the foundations in your own work and contribute to larger design teams.
Military Design Thinking Advanced
Undertake demanding design work independently. Deepen your research and design methods, incorporate strategic foresight and adapt TRACE to different problems. Develop judgement through several cases and a supported assignment.


Military Design Thinking Lead
Design and lead MDT projects. Structure the work, guide teams through disagreement and uncertainty, and work with sponsors and stakeholders. Apply the learning to an organisational project, supported by coaching.
Military Design Thinking Executive
Commission and assess design work. Learn to set a purposeful brief, establish conditions for effective work and judge when findings justify further investigation, experimentation or change. For leaders and sponsors responsible for MDT assignments.

Training needs opportunities for application. We work with organisations to identify where MDT will be used, which roles require which level of competence, and how learning can continue through practical work and feedback.
Our developing MDT community connects graduates and practitioners across organisational boundaries to discuss cases, compare experience and learn from application.

